"Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Topics for discussion

Moderator: TalkingPoint

Post Reply
User avatar
Dixie
Top
Top
Posts: 3836
Joined: July 2nd, 2004, 3:08 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Dixie »

LennyeTran wrote: we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
That's the point!
User avatar
Bambang
Top
Top
Posts: 870
Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang »

Rasheed wrote: Then this behaviour "Homosexual",
is it a disease or normal situation?
Is it a rule or personal behavior (depend on acceptance of the two persons to do this)?
What's the purpose of marriage?
What's the futuristic results, if this behaviour become common?
We don't need children, right?
We don't need any children. We don't need any generations. Thus, homosexsuality should be supported. Let's gayanize and lesbianize this world so that the population of this world will be decreasing pretty soon. I think this strategy is much more effective than the Chinese government's policy to limit the number of people by imposing a regulation for parents to have only one kid. :lol:
We're all friends, right?
User avatar
Bambang
Top
Top
Posts: 870
Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang »

LennyeTran wrote: :lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous. :mrgreen:
We're all friends, right?
User avatar
MissLT
Top
Top
Posts: 2529
Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT »

bambang wrote:
LennyeTran wrote: :lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous. :mrgreen:
I'm sorry. I wasn't really trying to be funny. I was using my "satire" to speak out Rasheed's hypocrisy. He called people liars and don't know what the truth is while he is the one who wants to believe things based on what he sees. Because he sees that I've corrected him, he denies to see the truth in my words. What Dixie said wasn't new, for it was what I said in page 3. Did he see it? Of course, not. I'm glad Dixie didn't wanna discuss it further with him since it'd be a waste of time anyway. This is the reason why people called her smart. :wink:
Hardi
Top
Top
Posts: 698
Joined: August 20th, 2004, 8:44 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Hardi »

Until the self reproduction is guaranteed, homosexuals are sure good for society.. They work as well as others.. Only their consumption habits might be different.. so baby-food companies might complain.
User avatar
MissLT
Top
Top
Posts: 2529
Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT »

Rasheed wrote: If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members,
:roll: (mumbling... what a load of ~)

:roll: I hope you didn't get this logic from school. Homosexuals don't sleep with their family members. Being a homosexual and choose the same gender mate has nothing to do with incest. Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
MissLT
Top
Top
Posts: 2529
Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT »

Rasheed wrote: So they are scared of this discussion.
Of course, we are scared. Did you even read your logic? It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, don't moan; only sluts do, be sexually available for your husband even when he's already had four wives, pray; only infidels don't pray, etc. :roll: :roll:
User avatar
Dixie
Top
Top
Posts: 3836
Joined: July 2nd, 2004, 3:08 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Dixie »

Rasheed wrote:
I don't know who refused the truth, that who search for her or who elude of it.
If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members, Maybe they are, I don't know. then should to confess many illogical things.
So they are scared of this discussion.
It's not a big problem if they use the lie to prove their views.
Some of them use some reports have no scientific bases, they vilified the wikipedia before, but now it's great, and we can trust it and depend on it.
Anyway, the future will uncover the truth, but till this moment they have a half of world's problem, and they are the creators of second half of problems.
It's clear that the sun shined from the east but it'll die in the west.
What a bunch of c***! Have you even attended school? How can you "reason" like that? And what does homosexuality have to do with incest?

EDIT: I just read Lennye's post above. Sorry they sound the same.
Hardi
Top
Top
Posts: 698
Joined: August 20th, 2004, 8:44 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Hardi »

Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? :roll:
User avatar
Bambang
Top
Top
Posts: 870
Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang »

LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?
I agree as incets gives kids. :lol: :lol: :lol: and the homos will never. :D :D :D
We're all friends, right?
User avatar
Bambang
Top
Top
Posts: 870
Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang »

LennyeTran wrote: ...It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, ...
Ha ha ha... 100X

I can's stop laughing! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
We're all friends, right?
User avatar
Bambang
Top
Top
Posts: 870
Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang »

Hardi wrote:Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? :roll:
Yes, you are dead right. :mrgreen:
We're all friends, right?
User avatar
MissLT
Top
Top
Posts: 2529
Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT »

bambang wrote:
LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?
I agree as incets gives kids. :lol: :lol: :lol: and the homos will never. :D :D :D
Adopt if you want kids and can't have one. Some straight people don't want kids. That's why we have a lot of orphans. Those kids have done nothing to deserve the neglect. What's the point of reproduction when one doesn't wanna take care of the result? :roll:
Moody
Top
Top
Posts: 32
Joined: August 3rd, 2007, 12:41 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Moody »

Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
Stanley
New
New
Posts: 4
Joined: January 30th, 2008, 11:18 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Stanley »

I don't want to discus the sexual side although it does play an important part.
Friendship is what it is all about. Gay boys are some of the nicest and most helpful you could meet, that is why such a lot of them work in the services industry. Hairdressers, cabin crew, catering, waiters, etc etc.
What is so wrong in having a same sex friend?
What is wrong if they like to cuddle, kiss, and hold hands?
And yes! they should be allowed to make vows to each other.
User avatar
MissLT
Top
Top
Posts: 2529
Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT »

Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you. :roll:
cosmo
New
New
Posts: 2
Joined: February 4th, 2008, 2:38 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by cosmo »

It is matter of individuals' choice! but my worry is what will happend to the boys (e.g.me) who looks for another kind of body? I hope there were girls too who would not like have relation with same sex and that hope keep alive my business
User avatar
Bambang
Top
Top
Posts: 870
Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang »

LennyeTran wrote:
Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you. :roll:
Lenny is the sex expert. Don't argue with her! :wink:
We're all friends, right?
Moody
Top
Top
Posts: 32
Joined: August 3rd, 2007, 12:41 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Moody »

L O L
User avatar
MissLT
Top
Top
Posts: 2529
Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT »

I'm sorry, there's no such thing as a sex expert in my world; I just didn't doze off in my anatomy and physiology class. Human bodies have always been a curiosity for me.
yomismo
New
New
Posts: 4
Joined: March 15th, 2008, 10:09 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by yomismo »

I agree with you
User avatar
donis
Top
Top
Posts: 71
Joined: December 18th, 2004, 10:16 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by donis »

In the world all country must have some rules which can not change by any reason like freedom of people. Like that topic..Ofcourse can not be.. If people want to this , thats mean they are crazy , but in the population people can not do what they want. If everybody can do what they want now ; i am sure after 10-20 years we could have very very strange generations.
User avatar
Annaa
Top
Top
Posts: 720
Joined: June 4th, 2008, 9:15 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Annaa »

I don`t agree with the marriages between people of the same sex,but I don`t judge gays and lesbains.
If you don`t like me remember it's mind over matter..I don't mind and you don't matter..
juan
Rising
Rising
Posts: 11
Joined: November 6th, 2008, 4:24 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by juan »

I think every person has the rhigt to choose , who she or he wants to be with,Its the right that we are born with.
but if the person that tried to induce others. that person is doing what the person is fighting against.
so as somebody said, respect others ideas as yu want them to respect yours, otherwise your goal is meaningful

if you wuant tonow who wrote this mi name is manuel mostly now as tepa or meno from jalisco mexico
ritapally
New
New
Posts: 4
Joined: December 3rd, 2008, 1:15 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by ritapally »

i'm disagree marriage between people of the seme sex because i think this is against nature.but i'm not against gay people......
fatema
New
New
Posts: 3
Joined: January 2nd, 2009, 10:19 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by fatema »

Marriage from the same sex should not be allowed
User avatar
AdiNNa
Rising
Rising
Posts: 19
Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 7:15 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by AdiNNa »

I don't agree with marriage between people of the same sex :!!:
Consul
Rising
Rising
Posts: 5
Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 6:38 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Consul »

I think it is incompatibility that people of the same sex can live together and love each other=)) :-?
User avatar
AdiNNa
Rising
Rising
Posts: 19
Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 7:15 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by AdiNNa »

^still,it happens ..
User avatar
Anahita
Top
Top
Posts: 153
Joined: August 13th, 2005, 5:09 pm

Re:

Post by Anahita »

ronke wrote:Marriage from the same sex should not be allowed, In the first instance is not Godly .This should not be legalise in any nation.

I say this kind of narrow - mindedness is what really going to destroy morals at the end not the marriage between the same sex.

two people decide to live together out of love and respect and it happens that they are from the same sex. so what is the problem here? people should be free to choose their way of life and love. no god or religion is qualified enough to stop humans from expressing their true feelings and hearts.
Post Reply