That's the point!LennyeTran wrote: we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
"Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Moderator: TalkingPoint
- Dixie
- Top
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: July 2nd, 2004, 3:08 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
- Bambang
- Top
- Posts: 870
- Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
We don't need any children. We don't need any generations. Thus, homosexsuality should be supported. Let's gayanize and lesbianize this world so that the population of this world will be decreasing pretty soon. I think this strategy is much more effective than the Chinese government's policy to limit the number of people by imposing a regulation for parents to have only one kid.Rasheed wrote: Then this behaviour "Homosexual",
is it a disease or normal situation?
Is it a rule or personal behavior (depend on acceptance of the two persons to do this)?
What's the purpose of marriage?
What's the futuristic results, if this behaviour become common?
We don't need children, right?

We're all friends, right?
- Bambang
- Top
- Posts: 870
- Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous.LennyeTran wrote:I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth?
![]()
Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?

We're all friends, right?
- MissLT
- Top
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I'm sorry. I wasn't really trying to be funny. I was using my "satire" to speak out Rasheed's hypocrisy. He called people liars and don't know what the truth is while he is the one who wants to believe things based on what he sees. Because he sees that I've corrected him, he denies to see the truth in my words. What Dixie said wasn't new, for it was what I said in page 3. Did he see it? Of course, not. I'm glad Dixie didn't wanna discuss it further with him since it'd be a waste of time anyway. This is the reason why people called her smart.bambang wrote:When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous.LennyeTran wrote:I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth?
![]()
Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
-
- Top
- Posts: 698
- Joined: August 20th, 2004, 8:44 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Until the self reproduction is guaranteed, homosexuals are sure good for society.. They work as well as others.. Only their consumption habits might be different.. so baby-food companies might complain.
- MissLT
- Top
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Rasheed wrote: If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members,





- MissLT
- Top
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Of course, we are scared. Did you even read your logic? It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, don't moan; only sluts do, be sexually available for your husband even when he's already had four wives, pray; only infidels don't pray, etc.Rasheed wrote: So they are scared of this discussion.


- Dixie
- Top
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: July 2nd, 2004, 3:08 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
What a bunch of c***! Have you even attended school? How can you "reason" like that? And what does homosexuality have to do with incest?Rasheed wrote:
I don't know who refused the truth, that who search for her or who elude of it.
If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members, Maybe they are, I don't know. then should to confess many illogical things.
So they are scared of this discussion.
It's not a big problem if they use the lie to prove their views.
Some of them use some reports have no scientific bases, they vilified the wikipedia before, but now it's great, and we can trust it and depend on it.
Anyway, the future will uncover the truth, but till this moment they have a half of world's problem, and they are the creators of second half of problems.
It's clear that the sun shined from the east but it'll die in the west.
EDIT: I just read Lennye's post above. Sorry they sound the same.
-
- Top
- Posts: 698
- Joined: August 20th, 2004, 8:44 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? 

- Bambang
- Top
- Posts: 870
- Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't.![]()
![]()
I agree as incets gives kids.



We're all friends, right?
- Bambang
- Top
- Posts: 870
- Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Ha ha ha... 100XLennyeTran wrote: ...It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, ...
I can's stop laughing!









We're all friends, right?
- Bambang
- Top
- Posts: 870
- Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Yes, you are dead right.Hardi wrote:Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members?

We're all friends, right?
- MissLT
- Top
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Adopt if you want kids and can't have one. Some straight people don't want kids. That's why we have a lot of orphans. Those kids have done nothing to deserve the neglect. What's the point of reproduction when one doesn't wanna take care of the result?bambang wrote:Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't.![]()
![]()
I agree as incets gives kids.![]()
![]()
and the homos will never. :D :D :D

-
- Top
- Posts: 32
- Joined: August 3rd, 2007, 12:41 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).
It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!
Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.
1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??
Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??
Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!
Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.
1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??
Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??
Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
-
- New
- Posts: 4
- Joined: January 30th, 2008, 11:18 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I don't want to discus the sexual side although it does play an important part.
Friendship is what it is all about. Gay boys are some of the nicest and most helpful you could meet, that is why such a lot of them work in the services industry. Hairdressers, cabin crew, catering, waiters, etc etc.
What is so wrong in having a same sex friend?
What is wrong if they like to cuddle, kiss, and hold hands?
And yes! they should be allowed to make vows to each other.
Friendship is what it is all about. Gay boys are some of the nicest and most helpful you could meet, that is why such a lot of them work in the services industry. Hairdressers, cabin crew, catering, waiters, etc etc.
What is so wrong in having a same sex friend?
What is wrong if they like to cuddle, kiss, and hold hands?
And yes! they should be allowed to make vows to each other.
- MissLT
- Top
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you.Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).
It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!
Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.
1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??
Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??
Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!

-
- New
- Posts: 2
- Joined: February 4th, 2008, 2:38 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
It is matter of individuals' choice! but my worry is what will happend to the boys (e.g.me) who looks for another kind of body? I hope there were girls too who would not like have relation with same sex and that hope keep alive my business
- Bambang
- Top
- Posts: 870
- Joined: May 13th, 2007, 4:26 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Lenny is the sex expert. Don't argue with her!LennyeTran wrote:I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you.Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).
It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!
Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.
1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??
Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??
Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
We're all friends, right?
-
- Top
- Posts: 32
- Joined: August 3rd, 2007, 12:41 pm
- MissLT
- Top
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: April 6th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I'm sorry, there's no such thing as a sex expert in my world; I just didn't doze off in my anatomy and physiology class. Human bodies have always been a curiosity for me.
-
- New
- Posts: 4
- Joined: March 15th, 2008, 10:09 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I agree with you
- donis
- Top
- Posts: 71
- Joined: December 18th, 2004, 10:16 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
In the world all country must have some rules which can not change by any reason like freedom of people. Like that topic..Ofcourse can not be.. If people want to this , thats mean they are crazy , but in the population people can not do what they want. If everybody can do what they want now ; i am sure after 10-20 years we could have very very strange generations.
- Annaa
- Top
- Posts: 720
- Joined: June 4th, 2008, 9:15 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I don`t agree with the marriages between people of the same sex,but I don`t judge gays and lesbains.
If you don`t like me remember it's mind over matter..I don't mind and you don't matter..
-
- Rising
- Posts: 11
- Joined: November 6th, 2008, 4:24 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I think every person has the rhigt to choose , who she or he wants to be with,Its the right that we are born with.
but if the person that tried to induce others. that person is doing what the person is fighting against.
so as somebody said, respect others ideas as yu want them to respect yours, otherwise your goal is meaningful
if you wuant tonow who wrote this mi name is manuel mostly now as tepa or meno from jalisco mexico
but if the person that tried to induce others. that person is doing what the person is fighting against.
so as somebody said, respect others ideas as yu want them to respect yours, otherwise your goal is meaningful
if you wuant tonow who wrote this mi name is manuel mostly now as tepa or meno from jalisco mexico
-
- New
- Posts: 4
- Joined: December 3rd, 2008, 1:15 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
i'm disagree marriage between people of the seme sex because i think this is against nature.but i'm not against gay people......
-
- New
- Posts: 3
- Joined: January 2nd, 2009, 10:19 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
Marriage from the same sex should not be allowed
- AdiNNa
- Rising
- Posts: 19
- Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 7:15 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I don't agree with marriage between people of the same sex 

-
- Rising
- Posts: 5
- Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 6:38 am
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
I think it is incompatibility that people of the same sex can live together and love each other=)) 

- AdiNNa
- Rising
- Posts: 19
- Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 7:15 pm
Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?
^still,it happens ..
- Anahita
- Top
- Posts: 153
- Joined: August 13th, 2005, 5:09 pm
Re:
ronke wrote:Marriage from the same sex should not be allowed, In the first instance is not Godly .This should not be legalise in any nation.
I say this kind of narrow - mindedness is what really going to destroy morals at the end not the marriage between the same sex.
two people decide to live together out of love and respect and it happens that they are from the same sex. so what is the problem here? people should be free to choose their way of life and love. no god or religion is qualified enough to stop humans from expressing their true feelings and hearts.