Page 1 of 1

A phrase that I have not seen before.

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:20 am
by sinotrader
Recently, I read a sentence that got me confused. I am not sure if that sentence was originally created from a different language other than English and translated into English, or it was created by an English speaker. Please enlighten me with your explanation.

We are not less delighted to find an early primrose because we knew well that the season of the service to look for primrose is in March and April not October.

What I struggle is why couldn't it say, "we are very delighted to find...?"
If "not less delighted" means very delighted, can "not more delighted" mean very angry?
I am not familiar with these terms at all. Please help!

Re: A phrase that I have not seen before.

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:24 am
by Joe
Please double-check. Do they say:

We are not less delighted...

OR

We are no less delighted...

Re: A phrase that I have not seen before.

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:23 am
by sinotrader
Hi Joe,

Thank you so much for your response.
I have double checked. It was stated "We are not less delighted..."

So, is it a right expression or non-standard English?

Re: A phrase that I have not seen before.

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:40 am
by Joe
Almost certainly it should be:

We are no less delighted...

This kind of expression usually follows a previous expression of delight (or whatever), for example:

We are delighted that you passed your exam. And we are no less delighted that you will be going to university.

So it's a way of saying "we are equally delighted", but it's rather formal.

We are no less happy
We are no less concerned
We are no less afraid
We are no less excited
We are no less hopeful
etc etc

Re: A phrase that I have not seen before.

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:50 am
by sinotrader
Thank you so much, Joe.
I do appreciate your comments from which I have learned a new expression.