At about 17′39″ into the video linked below, I'm pretty sure the instructor was saying "all I wanted to do was get to the free food" rather than "... was to get to the free food""
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1054&v= ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]
I'm aware the main pattern in this sentence is “what X was Y” though, I'd just like to know whether it is common and acceptable to say something like that in spoken English? For example, use "all I wanted to do is do something" instead of "all I wanted to do is to do something"?
"all I wanted to do is do something" vs. "all I wanted to do is to do something"
Moderator: EC
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:36 am
- Status: Learner of English
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 10:53 pm
- Status: Other
Re: "all I wanted to do is do something" vs. "all I wanted to do is to do something"
The first "to" already eliminates the other "to" I believe...
Try twisting the first part into the following pattern: grammatical person+only+verb+to
In this case: All I wanted to do was = I only wanted to
As you can see, you already have "to", so you can't add another one, because you can't "want to do to something"
Another example:
"All you had to do was take care of the dog."
All you had to do was = You only had to
Try twisting the first part into the following pattern: grammatical person+only+verb+to
In this case: All I wanted to do was = I only wanted to
As you can see, you already have "to", so you can't add another one, because you can't "want to do to something"
Another example:
"All you had to do was take care of the dog."
All you had to do was = You only had to